MEASURING TRANSIENT MEMORY LOAD.WANNER E; SHINER S.1976; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 159-167; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

CONTEXT EFFECTS IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION: A REPLY TO DOLL AND LAPINSKIDOOLING DJ; CHRISTIAANSEN RE.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 261-262; BIBL. 11REFArticle

THE COMPREHENSIBILITY OF PRINTED INSTRUCTIONS AND THE FLOW CHART ALTERNATIVEKAMMANN R.1975; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 183-191; BIBL. 12REFArticle

QUELQUES ASPECTS DE LA COMPREHENSION DU LANGAGE: MEMOIRE SEMANTIQUE ET COMPREHENSION.DUBOIS D.1976; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1976; NO SPEC.; PP. 307-313; BIBL. 1 P.Article

COMPREHENSION OF TEXTBOOK VOCABULARY BY FIRST YEAR STUDENTS.KNOX RE.1976; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 388-390; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

SENTENCE COMPREHENSION: A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC PROCESSING MODEL OF VERIFICATIONCARPENTER PA; JUST MA.1975; PSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 82; NO 1; PP. 45-73; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

SURFACE AND DEEP STRUCTURE IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION.LAYTON P; SIMPSON AJ.1975; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 14; NO 6; PP. 658-664; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

KANN MAN VERSTANDLICHKEIT MESSEN = PEUT-ON MESURER LA COMPREHENSION.BRIEST W.1974; Z. PHONET. SPRACHWISSENSCH. KOMMUNIK.-FORSCH.; DTSCH.; DA. 1974; VOL. 27; NO 6; PP. 543-563; BIBL. 8REF.Article

REFERENTIAL COHERENCE AND TEXT STRUCTURE IN STORY COMPREHENSIONCIRILO RK.1981; J. VERB. LEARN. VERB. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5371; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 358-367; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

FRAMEWORKS FOR COMPREHENDING DISCOURSE. A REPLICATION STUDYSJOGREN D; TIMPSON W.1979; AMER. EDUC. RES. J.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 341-346; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

TOWARD A MODEL OF TEXT COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTIONKINTSCH W; VAN DIJK TA.1978; PSYCHOL. REV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 85; NO 5; PP. 363-394; BIBL. 2 P.Article

SPRICHWORTERKLAEREN UND BILDERGESCHICHTENDEUTEN BEI PSYCHOSEN = INTERPRETATION DES PROVERBES ET DES HISTOIRES PHOTOGRAPHIQUES DANS LES PSYCHOSESDAUN H; HIFINGER E; JAKOB H et al.1978; MED. WELT; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 29; NO 33; PP. 1263-1267; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

ON THE SURFACE STRUCTURE OF INFINITIVE-COMPLEMENT SENTENCES.KEMPER S; CATLIN J; BOWERS JS et al.1977; J. PSYCHOLINGUIST. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 1-19; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PROCEDURAL SEMANTICS.JOHNSON LAIRD PN.1977; COGNITION; NETHERL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 189-214; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 2 P.Article

COMPREHENSION OF METAPHORS: A TEST OF THE TWO-STAGE PROCESSING MODEL.HARRIS RJ.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 4; PP. 312-314; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF NONFLUENCIES ON COMPREHENSION.HULIT LM.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 42; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1119-1122; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

PERFORMANCE THEORIES FOR SENTENCE CODING: SOME QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE.AARONSON D; SCARBOROUGH HS.1976; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 1; PP. 56-70; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF ADVERBIAL SUBORDINATE CLAUSE POSITION ON READING COMPREHENSION.SZABO RJ.1976; J. EDUC. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 69; NO 9; PP. 331-332; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF INFERENCE IN CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSION AND MEMORY FOR SENTENCES.PARIS SG; LINDAUER BK.1976; COGNIT. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 217-227; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

HOW ABSTRACT IS A YOUNG CHILD'S KNOWLEDGE OF SYNTAXHUTSON BA.1975; J. GENET. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 126; NO 1; PP. 19-26; BIBL. 12REF.Article

HOW CHILDREN UNDERSTAND FULL, TRUNCATED, AND ANOMALOUS PASSIVESMARATSOS MP; ABRAMOVITCH R.1975; J. VERB. LEARNG. VERB. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 145-157; BIBL. 1PArticle

RELATIVE COMPREHENSIBILITY OF PICTORIAL INFORMATION AND PRINTED WORDS IN PROCEDURALIZED INSTRUCTIONSBOOHER HR.1975; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 3; PP. 266-277; BIBL. 15REFArticle

THE EFFECTS OF PAUSE TIME ON AUDITORY COMPREHENSION OF APHASIC SUBJECTS. = LES EFFETS DU TEMPS DE PAUSE SUR LA COMPREHENSION AUDITIVE DE SUJETS APHASIQUESLILES BZ; BROOKSHIRE RH.1975; J. COMMUNIC. DISORD.; NETHERL.; DA. 1975; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 221-235; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSION OF COMPARATIVE FORMSTOWNSEND DJ.1974; J. EXPER. CHILD PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 293-303; BIBL. 16REF.Article

EFFECT OF TASK DEMANDS ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EYE MOVEMENTS AND SENTENCE COMPLEXITYKLEIN GA; KURKOWSKI F.1974; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 39; NO 1PART.2; PP. 463-466; BIBL. 5REF.Article